The EMSA website uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, in accordance with the EMSA privacy notice. Find out more on how we use cookies

 

EMSA

Ship Safety Standards - Presentations

Study assessing the acceptable and practicable risk level of passenger ships related to damage stability ("EMSA 3"), undertaken by DNVGL

The issue of stability, and especially damage stability of passenger ships, has been frequently re-visited. This has been so, not due to the number of associated accidents, but due to the consequences that these accidents can have.

Currently, in the EU, new passenger ships must comply with SOLAS2009, while ro-ro passenger ships also need to comply with the Stockholm Agreement. Both UoS and HSVA studies commissioned by EMSA, and also other projects such as GOALDS and MCA RP592 among others, have focused their work on the damage stability standard set by SOLAS2009. It is generally accepted that the probabilistic approach is a useful tool to objectively estimate the damage stability properties of a specific vessel.

Some of the previous studies (UoS, GOALDS) concluded that an increase in the Required Subdivision Index ‘R’ would be a suitable solution for the existing damage stability weakness concerning passenger ships and ro-ro passenger ships. Following the first discussions held at IMO, it appears that the ‘R’ is now a central issue.

Despite the extensive work already done, doubts have been expressed on one hand regarding the feasibility of the application of a high ‘R’ and, on the other hand, as to whether the safety level implied by ‘R’ is adequate.

It has notably been questioned whether large raking damages of the likes of the Costa Concordia are taken into consideration, whether better design solutions can be adopted with regard to watertight doors, or even whether any of these measures can be applied to existing passenger ships.

In view of all the pending questions and the possible consequences of the on-going debates, the European Commission requested EMSA to initiate a new study to fill in the recognised knowledge gaps.

Main Information

The study is separated into 6 sub-studies:

  • Identification and evaluation of risk acceptance and cost-benefit criteria and application to risk based collision damage stability;
  • Evaluation of risk from watertight doors and risk based mitigating measures;
  • Evaluation of raking damages due to groundings and possible amendments to the damage stability  framework;
  • Assessment of cost effectiveness or previous parts, FSA compilation and recommendations for      decision making;
  • Impact assessment compilation;
  • Updating of the results obtained from the GOALDS project according to the latest development in      IMO.

The study is managed by DNV-GL and is established as a joint project which includes the major European shipyards/designers, operators, universities, research institutes and software manufacturer.

The project had its kick off meeting in November 2013 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2015.

Published Files
EMSA 3 - A Study assesing the acceptable and practicable risk level of passenger ships related to damage stability 19.02.2015
EMSA 3 - A Study assesing the acceptable and practicable risk level of passenger ships related to damage stability 11.11.2015
EMSA 3 – Final Presentation 21.01.2016
EMSA3 presentation – Tasks 1-4 17.09.2015
STUDY 1 - EMSA 3 - Risk acceptance criteria and risk based damage stability (Part 1 + Part 2) 22.07.2015
STUDY 2 - EMSA 3 - Evaluation of risk from watertight doors 22.07.2015
STUDY 3 -EMSA 3 - Evaluation of risk from groundings 22.07.2015
STUDY 4 - EMSA 3 – FSA compilation and recommendations for decision making 22.07.2015
STUDY 5 – EMSA 3 – Impact Assessment 18.01.2016
STUDY 6 - EMSA 3 - Damage stability calculations of GOALDS RoPax designs 22.07.2015